5.A FY06 PROGRESS: ACCELERATOR TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH
DEPARTMENT by Sami Tantawi Appendix B
Self-Evaluation FY2006
Return
to Table of Contents
The Accelerator Technology Research Department has
worked on a wide variety of topics this past year. The
work has four main directions: performance enhancement
of current accelerators at SLAC such as PEP-II; research
and design for near future facilities such as ILC;
upgrades to PEPII or LCLS; and research in fundamental
aspects of accelerator and beam physics. Selected topics
from ATR are discussed below.
1.1.1.
Electronics Research. Electronics Research combines
SLAC staff with Stanford graduate students in Applied
Physics and Electrical Engineering to provide both
accelerator physics and technology skills for
accelerator projects. The group’s hardware and software
instability control systems have been implemented
at labs in the US, Europe and Asia. During the year the
group has presented results through nine journal
publications, at the CERN LLRF Workshop, and at the
European Particle Accelerator Conference. John Fox
taught two Stanford courses in Applied Physics and
Dmitry Teytelman was an organizer for the CERN LLRF
workshop. The group currently includes four full-time
SLAC staff and two Stanford graduate students.
1.1.2.
The group has been central in efforts to better
understand the interactions of the PEP-II rf systems,
with their complex impedance-reducing feedback
architectures, and the longitudinal dynamics of the
machine. These efforts are broad and include simulation
modeling as well as extensive machine physics studies.
In a parallel effort, the group continues to measure and
control the HOM coupled bunch instabilities in PEP-II
via the broadband coupled bunch feedback systems.
In 2005/2006 instability control activities were
increased at LNF-INFN (DAFNE) and a series of studies
was begun at KEK-B and the ATF. FY2005/2006 also brought
some new activity related to LCLS in the form of
dynamics modeling for the LLRF control of the rf gun,
and in review functions for the LCLS LLRF development.
PEP-II Activities
In 2006, focus was continued on high current
configuration and stability of the rf systems through
machine physics experiments, nonlinear numeric
simulation and analytical studies. In 2006 PEPII ran at
record currents and luminosity, and the increases in
PEP-II currents (to 1860 mA HER and 3A LER) have been
possible because of the group’s development and
commissioning of the Low Group Delay Woofer in 2005 (the
capabilities of the original rf system implementation
were exceeded with 2006 operating currents).
Additionally, a new configuration technique was
developed for the PEP-II rf stations that trades-off
growth rates for station stability, and this “comb
rotation” technique is a significant new approach to
allow high current operation
Another PEP-II research area involves techniques to
linearize the high power klystrons. In 2005/2006 the
group developed prototypes of this nonlinear processing
channel through installation of four prototypes in the
LER. This year focused on a machine development effort
to understand the linearizer interaction with the
complex LLRF systems. These linearizers are a mix of RF
circuitry plus a digital processor used for gain
compensation to keep the closed-loop frequency response
stable. This project is led by Dan Van Winkle.
Photo of the prototype linearizers, incorporating 476
MHz rf circuitry and digital compensation control
techniques.
These linearizer efforts led to successful
demonstration of the technology and operation as a test
in the PEP-II LER. One of the most valuable aspects of
the project involved the close ties with the modeling
and simulation of low-mode dynamics, and understanding
the impact of a linearized klystron in the LLRF system
helped lead to higher-current operational configurations
needed for the 3A operation of LER.
The figure shows the time-domain output of a PEP-II
klystron without the linearizer (the gain of the
klystron is modulated by power supply ripple). The
second figure shows the action of the linearizer in
fixing the small-signal gain, so that the modulation of
gain from the high-voltage power supply is greatly
reduced. This improved linearity in small-signal gain
increases the effectiveness of the direct and comb loop
impedance control loops in the LLRF systems.
Instability Control Systems (coupled-bunch feedback
systems)
High-speed signal processing systems development has
continued, and this last year the detailed circuit and
signal processing system designs for a 1.5 GSample/s
feedback processing channel moved forward. This new
architecture is of direct applicability to PEP-II and
other collider needs, and can implement either
longitudinal (downsampled) or transverse
(non-downsampled) processing systems. It represents a
significant advance in the processing speed and density
previously achieved. The initial development has been
done in conjunction with Dr. Makoto Tobiyama of KEK, and
has progressed to include a significant funding
component under the US-Japan Cooperative Program in High
Energy Physics. A one-fourth capacity processing
prototype (the Gproto) was developed by Dmitry Teytelman
as a proof of concept demonstrator. This Gproto system
has the capability to run transverse or longitudinal
coupled-bunch feedback algorithms at a 500 megasample/s
rate.
Two GProto channels have been fabricated and in
2005/2006 commissioned at DAFNE (for transverse e+
control), PEP-II (transverse LER control), KEK-B
(transverse control) and ATF (longitudinal control). A
design for an integrated iGP was completed in September
2006 - this control channel is in fabrication for use at
several facilities. Based on the operating experience
from these 500 megasample/s iGp channels there are plans
in place to construct the full speed (1.5 gigasample/s)
GBoard channels in future years
Power Spectrum of multibunch beams in the ATF,
showing the effectiveness of the iGp longitudinal
feedback control.
The figure shows the impact of longitudinal control
at the ATF (KEK) using the GProto channel. The ATF is
particularly directed at developing low-emittance beams
for ILC studies, and studies in November 2005 and April
2006 included studies of noise structures on the beam as
well as studies of the beam emittance as a function of
longitudinal motion. The figure shows that the iGp
reduces the longitudinal motion by over two orders of
magnitude.
Plot of LER vertical RMS motion in KEKB LER as a
function of system gain
A study of transverse motion and coupled-bunch
instability in the KEKB LER has continued. The figure
shows a study of residual RMS vertical beam motion as a
function of system gain. Over the range of gain shown
the beam is always stable, but an increase of transverse
residual motion with increasing gain shows the noise
limits of the detection channel, and helps find an
optimal operating point to have adequate damping margins
without increasing the transverse beam size.
PEP-II Modeling Effort
Modeling to study the dynamics of the rf systems in
PEP-II is necessary to predict the behavior of the
systems at upgraded currents, and to evaluate possible
new control techniques or new control hardware for
future low-level rf systems.
The rf system and accelerator dynamics simulation is
a nonlinear time domain simulation which models the
direct and comb loop behavior in the rf systems, as well
as the interaction of the high current beam with the rf
cavities and high power klystrons. This model has been
expanded to allow the simulation of the HER ring with 2
and 4 cavity rf stations. The essential elements of the
nonlinear time domain model are shown in the figure.
.The simulation model can be used to predict
instability growth rates and modal patterns. By
simulating existing conditions, and comparing the
results to actual machine operating data, the validity
of the model has been verified. The model can then be
used to predict higher-current operation of the machine,
and evaluate new operating configurations, and stability
margins for future operating points.
The figure below shows the predicted modal growth
rates for the PEP-II LER at 2.5 A. The model is in
excellent agreement with the measurements of the LER
machine. The next figure shows the expected growth rates
for operating currents up to 3 A, with several possible
rf station configurations shown. These predictive models
help to develop new LLRF configurations required at
higher currents in advance of the physical machine being
available at these operating points.
The figure above shows the estimated growth rates in
the LER for several different gap voltage and station
configurations.
Study of “comb rotation” configuration technique in
the LER, with simulation results compared with physical
measurements
The impact of the “comb rotation” technique can be
seen in the figure above, which compares the simulation
results with the measurements of the PEP-II LER. There
is agreement between the model and the physical system
for the most unstable mode, as well as the overall shape
of the curves. A configuration change of roughly ten
degrees in the comb filter reduces the instability
growth rates by a factor of three. This technique
resulted from the insights into the physics gained from
the simulation effort. In summer 2006 this comb rotation
technique was implemented in the LER as part of the high
current commissioning, and was central in reaching the
3A record.
LCLS Contributions
In 2005/2006 the group led two separate LCLS LLRF
system reviews, highlighting design options and helping
the LCLS project focus efforts on critical technology
questions.
Claudio Rivetta contributed to the LCLS project by
modeling the rf gun cavity stability and frequency
tuning. These efforts helped the LCLS group specify the
necessary components and performance of the temperature
control loops for the cavity cooling, as well as
estimate the rejection of outside disturbances. His
initial study proposes the necessary control algorithms
for LCLS commissioning.
The figure shows the block diagram of the rf gun,
with temperature control loops and rf system loops. The
dynamics of the system is driven by both, and there are
slow dynamics (in the water control system) and thermal
dynamics in the rf heating of the cavity. The regulator
which controls the rf excitation also drives the system
response.
The figure shows the expected transient response for
the RF gun as the RF power is initially applied. The
system responds with perturbations in cavity center
frequency, then stabilizes at the desired operating
frequency. The cavity amplitude and phase are
additionally controlled via feedback through the LLRF
system.
Accelerator Structures
The mission of Rf Structures group is to design,
engineer, and test a variety of accelerator structures
with superior properties in high rf efficiency, good
Higher Order Mode (HOM) suppression and high gradient
performance. These activities span design theory and
practice, simulation, structure related beam dynamics
studies, fabrication technology, microwave measurements,
structure characterization and high power experiments.
Accelerator R&D programs at SLAC are supported including
the ILC, LCLS and others.
Accelerator Structures Work
1). Accelerator structures for the ILC positron
source and electron source
Progress has been made toward an improved alternative
design for L-Band normal conducting accelerating system
for the ILC positron source and electron source
including both standing wave (SW) and traveling wave
(TW) sections. The schematic layout of the accelerator
system for the ILC positron source is shown below.
Schematic layout of the ILC positron source.
There are two types of accelerator structures:
the11-cell SW structure for capturing positrons and the
4.3 m 3π/4 mode TW structure. The following tables show
their basic rf parameters.
Table 1 Parameters of 1.3 m SW structure
Structure Type |
Simple π
Mode |
Cell Number |
11 |
Aperture 2a |
60 mm |
Q |
29700 |
Shunt impedance r |
34.3 MΩ/m |
E0 (8.6 MW input) |
15.2 MV/m |
Table 2 Parameters of 4.3 m TW structure
Structure Type |
TW 3π/4
Mode |
Cell Number |
50 |
Aperture 2a |
46 mm |
Attenuation τ |
0.98 |
Q |
24842 - 21676 |
Group velocity Vg/c |
0.62% – 0.14% |
Shunt impedance r |
48.60 – 39.45 MΩ/m |
Filling time Tf |
5.3 μs |
Power Dissipation |
8.2 kW/m |
E0 (10 MW input) |
8.5 MV/m |
The simple π mode
SW structure with 11 cells is designed for high gradient
(15 MV/m) positron capturing. The advantages are more
effective cooling, higher shunt impedance with larger
aperture (60 mm), lower rf pulse heating, apparent
simplicity and cost saving. The mode and amplitude
stability for this type of structure has been calculated
theoretically to be feasible.
In order to optimize the rf efficiency, the “phase
advance per cell” has been used as a knob for designing
large aperture, constant gradient 4.3 m TW structures.
The advantages are lower pulse heating, easy
installation for long solenoids, no need for rf
reflection protection (circulators), apparent simplicity
and cost saving.
Some extensive PARMELA simulations have been
conducted for the beam dynamics using various
accelerating gradients and structure combination.
2). L-Band 5-cell SW test accelerator section for the
positron capture structure
In order to gain fabrication experience and to make
high power tests at full gradient and pulse length with
an existing 5 MW peak power L-band klystron, a 5-cell
L-band test structure was designed with a coupler cell
at one end and all necessary features for a positron
capture section. Due to the low priorities in the
machine shops, the structure fabrication schedule has
been much delayed. Hopefully, this will be completed by
the end of 2006 and the test can be started in the early
2007.
Figure 2. A 5-cell L-band SW accelerator section for
the positron capturing.
Figure 3. Some of the subassemblies for the 5-cell SW
structure: a completed unit cell (left), a half cell to
be brazed on the input coupler (middle), L-band rf
window (right).
3). Three S-Band BPMs have been tested for the ILC
main linac beam diagnostics. The measurements showed the
TM11 mode working frequencies were accurate with 2856 +
1-3 MHz and two orientations were balanced with
frequency difference Δ|fx-fy|<0.75
MHz. The loaded QL value was close to the designed value
with 420 – 550. The cross coupling between x/y pick-ups
was better than -40db.
Figure 4. S-Band BPM for the ILC main linac: the
cutaway view (left) and microwave measurement set-up
(right).
4). Rf design of a Higher Order Mode (HOM) polarized
rf gun for the ILC
The ILC requires a polarized electron beam. The ILC
injector system can be simplified and made more
efficient if a GaAs-type cathode can be combined with a
low emittance rf gun. Compared with existing rf guns,
this type of cathode is known to be extremely sensitive
to vacuum, contaminations, and back bombardment by
electrons and ions. Careful studies have been made of a
new rf design for an L-band normal conducting (NC) rf
gun for the ILC polarized electron source. This design
incorporates a higher order mode (HOM) structure, with
much-improved conductance for vacuum pumping on the
cathode. Computer simulations have been used to optimize
the rf parameters with three principal goals: first to
minimize the required rf power; second to reduce the
peak surface field relative to the field at the cathode
in order to suppress field-emitted electron bombardment,
third to minimize the maximum surface magnetic field for
reduction of pulse heating and ease of cooling. The beam
properties have also been simulated initially using
PARMELA.
Figure 5. Layout of the polarized rf gun system
(left) and beam dynamics simulation (right).
Figure 6. Design examples for an HOM rf gun: (a) with
an output iris radius of 2.4 mm;
(b) with an output iris radius of 3.4 mm; (c) with a
rounding radius of 5 cm on the outer cell wall at the
output end; and (d) with an additional rounding radius
of 6 cm.
2) Accelerator Structures Work for the LCLS Project
Accelerator structures work for the LCLS began with
the 2004 LCLS Injector RF Technical Review. 1). Tuning
and characterization of the LCLS rf gun
The rf performance of the first LCLS rf gun has been
thoroughly studied including the frequencies of the
0-mode and π-mode,
quality factor as a function of the cathode tightening
torques, the electrical field distribution along the gun
axis, coupling coefficient and so on. The tuning was
done by machining a tuning ring in the cathode cell
based on careful microwave measurements and
calculations.
Figures 7. A bead drop microwave measurement set-up
for the electrical field distribution (left) and a plot
showing a perfect balanced field in cathode cell and
coupling cell (right).
By using bead pull technology and precise frequency
measurements for various cathode curvatures, complete
tuning curves – the ratio of the fields in cathode cell
and coupling cell as a function of mode spacing between
the 0-mode and π-mode
frequencies - as shown in the right plot in Figure 8 -
have been obtained and studied. The round red dot is the
perfect working point in the present and future
reference for cathode replacement. This work not only
contributed to the LCLS project for producing a superior
quality rf gun, it also gained some important knowledge
for its operation as well as the design of the next
generation of the LCLS rf gun.
Figure 8. The final assembly of the first LCLS RF gun
after microwave tuning, characterization and test probes
calibration (left) and the tuning curves (right).
2). In addition to measurement, retuning and
evaluation of two 9.5 ft S-band accelerator sections for
the new LCLS beam line, two candidates were selected for
booster sections from six 10-foot S-band accelerator
sections. The front ends were modified with new double
input waveguides and 5 new cells. The tuning and
characterization are complete. They are now baking and
will soon be ready for installation. A deflector section
was also tuned for the beam length measurement.
Figure 9. Microwave measurement set-up for an S-band
TW booster section (left) and a deflector for the beam
length measurements for the LCLS (right).
3. Other research related to accelerator structures
1). Wire-based structure experimental method
Progress continues to be made in wire measurement for
accelerator studies. This method can quickly and
inexpensively analyze the wakefield suppression
properties of accelerator structures. An improved
control program has been developed to move a brass wire
using microstepping motors and data acquisition. Also,
we are still analyzing the recorded S-parameters for
interpreting them to deduce the impedances of the
monopole band as well as the impedance of higher dipole
mode bands.
2). MicroLinac
Work continues on the MicroLinac, which is a small,
standing wave (SW) linac. It is intended as a low-cost
radiography source with dosage larger than 100 Ci. This
linac could be used in place of radioactive sources,
which can potentially be used for “dirty bombs.” The
preliminary operation showed too much of the unwanted rf
phase drift due to the rf power transfer, leading to the
beam energy reduction and low capture efficiency. Now,
design studies are under way for an alternative
traveling wave structure.
High Gradient Program
During this fiscal year a dedicated high-gradient
program was initiated at SLAC. This program is part of
the new US collaborative initiative on high gradient
research. The purpose of this collaboration is to
perform research to determine the gradient potential of
normal-conducting, rfpowered particle beam accelerators,
and to develop the necessary accelerator technology to
achieve those high gradients. Harnessing the momentum of
the concluded NLC/JLC development programs and working
in conjunction with the ongoing CLIC studies, the
collaboration will explore the possibility of pushing
the useable acceleration gradient from the 65 MV/m
reliably achieved in NLC structures up towards 180 MV/m
or higher. Advancing the state-of-the-art in this area
is essential to the realization of a post-ILC, multi-TeV
linear collider using two-beam rf power generation.
This research and development effort includes
studying the rf breakdown phenomenon itself, both
theoretically and experimentally. This effort aims to
establish a better understanding of the frequency
scaling of the limiting gradient, as well as its
dependence on material, surface preparation, structure
design, pulsed heating, etc. It will explore the high
gradient barriers due to choices made in linear collider
programs to date. The experimental side of this effort
will entail the upgrade of test facilities and the
development of new high-power rf sources specifically
designed for high gradient testing. The final goal is to
produce and successfully test at very high gradient an
accelerator structure suitable for use in a multi-TeV
two-beam linear collider.
The high-gradient research initiative began with a
two-day workshop in July 2005, which was organized by
SLAC. The workshop spawned a nationwide collaboration
consisting of several participating institutions,
including universities and government laboratories, each
of which submitted one or more proposals for work
related to the goals of this initiative. These
participants all have histories of contributions to the
fields of accelerator design and/or high power rf R&D.
Each institution brings its own capabilities, facilities
and academic/scientific missions to the service of the
collaboration and will be funded for participation
through their normal DOE grants. These institutions form
the initial collaboration; however, the make up of the
collaboration may change based on each institution’s
funding and goals.
After the initial meeting, several activities under
the leadership of SLAC scientists continued to
strengthen this collaboration
a. On September 9, 2005, S. Tantawi gave a talk
at LBNL and discussed their planned studies.
b. Second collaboration meeting at the University
of Maryland, November 18, 2005.
c. The 2006 Advanced Accelerator Concepts
workshop had a working group on High Gradient RF
Research chaired by S. Tantawi (SLAC) and co-chaired
by V. Dolgashev (SLAC).
SLAC hosts this collaboration. Its experimental
facilities will be available to collaborators for
experiments supported through this collaboration. The
program at SLAC will have three principal elements:
1) Enhancement of the experimental facilities, 2)
SLAC’s experimental program, and 3) SLAC’s
theoretical program.
Experimental Areas
Rf breakdown studies are still in their infancy. Very
little is known either about the theory of surface
breakdown at microwave frequencies or about the effect
of geometries and the response of simple materials, let
alone alloys and composites. The initial program is
characterized by intensive experimental efforts. This
program has to address the basic physics of breakdown
phenomena. Because of its exploratory nature, a large
number of experiments addressing different aspects of
geometrical change and material variations are needed.
Hence, priorities have to be given to establish
experimental facilities capable of operating with a high
enough repetition rate. Also, as recent experiments
show, the frequency scaling of rf breakdown is not well
understood. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out
experiments at different frequencies. To do this, a
variety of high frequency rf sources is required, some
of which will need to be developed. In addition to
studying breakdown phenomena in existing accelerating
structures, it is necessary to have experimental
facilities to test novel structures.
Existing Experimental Areas
Generally speaking, any high gradient rf structure
reaches its limits after a period of high power
processing. The nature of this processing is an open
question. However, it is known that most structures more
than double their initial gradient after processing.
Also, the initial gradient that the structure can handle
is poorly correlated with the final gradient after
processing. This initial gradient correlates well with
the surface processing and machining of the surface,
while the final gradient is usually a function of
material and geometry. Therefore, the processing time
depends on the preparation and surface treatment.
Although a system where this processing time goes to
zero would be ideal, the potential for reduced or no
processing time for a particular geometry or a material
can not be ascertained without processing.
In any high vacuum system, a typical installation
procedure will take about 3 days to complete. At X-band,
the processing of copper structures typically takes
about 3 days at 60 Hz, with close to 1,000 breakdowns.
Refractory metals, on the other hand, take close to 4
weeks, with close to 100,000 breakdowns. Thus, an
experimental program aimed at exploring the problem in a
systematic way requires several test stands and the
ability to change and test structures relatively
quickly. The test stands need to be able to run at high
repetition rate (~60 Hz).
At the moment, the only place in the US capable of
doing tests at frequencies at S-band or above is SLAC.
Ideally, SLAC should serve as the primary experimental
site for the collaboration. At X-band, SLAC has three
stations at the NLCTA and one station at the Test Lab
capable of producing uncompressed pulses of ~80 MW, and
each of these stations has an associated pulse
compressor. There are an additional two stations, each
capable of producing up to 50 MW, but with no associated
pulse compressor. The capabilities of these stations
vary, and they are not all capable of supporting all
types of experiments. In effect, there are four useful
experimental stations. Even if they are all dedicated to
this program (at the moment not one is dedicated to this
program), and assuming an average of 4 weeks/experiment
for processing and characterization and a running time
of 40 weeks/year, only 40 experiments would be completed
per year, barely enough to do all the systematic studies
needed. The rate of 40 weeks of running time and 4 weeks
per experiment assumes that these stations are all
equipped with data acquisition systems and monitors and
that there are enough scientists and staff to service
the stations and to conduct the experiments. Clearly
this is not currently the case. As things stand, during
the NLC development time, the NLCTA was capable of
supporting about 10 experiments/year. The Test Lab
supported about 3 experiments/year. Hence, the first
order of business is to enhance the capabilities of
these test stands:
- The pulse compression system has been redesigned
so that one can change the compression ratio from 1
to about 4 or 8, depending on the station, without
breaking vacuum. This will reduce the time between
experiments and will lower the cost of
installations. The installation cost is one of the
big cost drivers, because it is labor intensive.
- To minimize the amount of vacuum work, windows
are being built before and after the device under
test. This will also minimize the cost and time.
- The general infrastructure for diagnostics is
being redesigned so that experiments can run in
parallel.
The programs/users that these stands will serve, for
the first year, are:
- SLAC’s experiments on geometries and materials,
in particular single and multiple cell
traveling-wave structures, single and multiple cell
standing-wave structures, distributed coupling
structures and waveguide structures.
- Finish SLAC’s series of experiments on NLC
structures; test CERN structures.
- Test Omega-P’s structures
- Test MIT structures (Scaled versions of most 17
GHz structures should be fabricated and tested at
11.4 GHz to understand frequency scaling).
- Test structures manufactured by KEK.
- Test and compare materials at ANL.
- Test structures proposed by HRC, but at 11.4 GHz
rather than 17 GHz.
RF Sources at High Frequencies
A. Gyrotron Development High power rf sources at high
frequency, 11.4GHz < f < 30GHz, are not available. These
are needed to study one of the most fundamental issues
in high gradient research, frequency scaling of
breakdown limits. At these high frequencies, a klystron
is not the device of choice. Gyrotrons are more
suitable, because they are fast-wave devices, in which
microwave power is produced in the circuits with sizes
on the order of a wavelength and above. Gyrotron
oscillators and amplifiers have a long history of
success at frequencies from 8-10 GHz up to 100-200 GHz.
Usually, gyrotron oscillators are simply called
gyrotrons, while gyroklystrons are amplifier forms of
these devices. Fundamentally, the development of
amplifiers is much more difficult than the development
of oscillators. In accelerator applications, amplifiers
are traditionally needed for two reasons: synchronizing
several devices and manipulating phase for a pulse
compression system. However, for high gradient studies
of single structures, raw power is all that is needed.
Also, developments in active pulse compression make it
possible to compress an oscillator signal.
Under the US High Gradient Collaboration, development
was proposed of a gyrotron oscillator at SLAC in
collaboration with other institutes. The oscillator
comprises the following elements:
1- A modulator.
I. The modulator already exists at SLAC.
2- A magnet, which can be either a superconducting
magnet for millimeter-wave radiation or water-cooled
solenoid for frequencies up to 20-30 GHz,
3- A
magnetron injection gun (MIG)
I. The MIG can be electrically designed as a
collaboration between SLAC, the University of
Maryland, MIT and CPI
II. The mechanical design of the MIG could be
done at SLAC.
4- Two microwave circuits to be installed on top of
the gun, one at 30 GHz and the other at ~22 GHz.
I. The microwave circuit design can be done in
collaboration between SLAC, University of Maryland,
MIT, CCR and CPI II. Manufacturing could be done at
SLAC or at outside shops. The necessary machining is
not demanding..
5- Active pulse compressors for the two frequencies.
These can be developed within SLAC.
The system can be installed near the ASTA bunker and
operated there for high gradient studies at high
frequency. This is the shortest route to providing a
workhorse for high gradient studies at high frequencies,
which could serve the worldwide research community. It
is also the most economical route to designing and
building these devices
B. Active Pulse Compression Active pulse compression
at high frequencies (11.4 GHz < f < 91 GHz) can be
readily achieved with the use of laser triggered bulk
effect semiconductor switches. With the advances made in
this field during recent years, one can project an
inexpensive active pulse compression system at 30 GHz,
which can be powered by either an oscillator or an
amplifier. The development of such a system would be the
shortest path to an operational test stand at 30 GHz. It
could be used with CLIC’s CTF-3 facility to compress the
output of the extraction linacs. Fast changes of the
output of these linacs are not easily attained, and a
pulse compressor that can work without a phase-flip is
the key device to make a useful test stand at CERN. Also
building a gyrotron oscillator is far easier than
building a gyroklystron amplifier, and, as stated above,
this will provide the needed compression system for such
an oscillator. Such a system has been designed and is
now under construction.
SLAC’s Experimental Program
The program is aimed at:
1) The study of the basic physics of rf breakdown,
and
2) Studying and testing novel accelerator structures,
including CERN and KEK structures.
Basic Physics Experimental Studies
There are three basic vehicles for these studies:
- Traveling-wave single cell accelerator
structures, see Figure 1,
- Single-cell standing-wave accelerator
structures,
- Waveguide structures
Figure 1. a) “single-cell” traveling-wave and
standing-wave test accelerator structures and b) a
“single-cell” structure with demountable low-field
couplers attached.
The single-cell, traveling-wave accelerator
structures employ a new concept recently developed at
SLAC. In these structures, a single cell which is a true
representative of a cell of a long accelerator
structure, is inserted between matching geometries that
mimic the response of a long accelerator structure. This
matching geometry has much lower fields though than the
accelerator cell. In this manner, one retains as much as
possible the elements of a real accelerator structure
while testing a structure that is much simpler and is
amenable to simulation and modeling.
Demountable couplers were added to these structures.
The concept was invented at SLAC and this type of
coupler has been proven to be reliable and tolerant of
high power operations. This greatly reduces the cost of
testing different structures, because the couplers are
reusable. These three types of structures will be used
to study both geometrical effects and materials. At the
moment, four couplers and nine different structures are
ready for testing. They have different material
combinations and geometries. This represents the start
of these studies. More structures must be created; in
particular, structures made from chromium and if
possible beryllium, are needed. Theoretical modeling at
SLAC has shown that these materials should have superior
performance, even better than the commonly sought after
refractory metals. It is very important to test these to
gain an insight into the theory of breakdown. If indeed
the behavior of materials can be predicted, one can
start on the road to the engineering of materials for
high gradient rf.
SLAC’s Theoretical Program
SLAC has been investigating theoretical and modeling
aspects of the breakdown process. A simulation of the
post breakdown phenomenon has been tested against
experimental results with success for some waveguide
geometries (See Figure 2) and accelerating structures.
Figure 2: Incident reflected and transmitted rf power
for a breakdown in the waveguide. a) a measurement of a
typical breakdown in the preprocessed waveguide. b) 3D
Particle-in-Cell simulations of the breakdown event.
Modeling of breakdown currents and the induced kick
to an accelerated beam has been performed at SLAC. A
unique theory for the breakdown threshold and the effect
of the material properties has been put forward by P.
Wilson. This effort is closely coupled to the
experimental program. Most of the innovations and
directions of the experimental program are driven by
theory and the possibility of modeling. At this stage
the modeling work will be directed toward creating a
multiphysics simulation environment that will include
electron-ion beam simulation in presence of
electromagnetic fields, simulation of interaction of the
beams with materials, and then transient
thermomechanical analysis of the beam-material
interaction. Using this environment, structure
materials, geometries and circuits will be analyzed and
compared with the experimental data.
5. B. FY06 PROGRESS: ACCELERATOR RESEARCH
DEPARTMENT-B (ARDB)
5.B. 1 NLCTA AND E-163 by Eric Colby
The NLC Test Accelerator (NLCTA) is operated by the
ILC Department in support of ILC R&D and advanced
accelerator R&D including X-band structure testing and
laser acceleration experiments. The operating funds for
the NLCTA come from the SLAC operating budget.
NLCTA Operations
During FY2006, the focus at the NLCTA has been on
L-band power source development and the commissioning of
an experimental facility for SLAC experiment E-163,
Laser Acceleration at the NLCTA. High Gradient RF work
was also carried out on X-band components, as described
above in Section 4.5.
A high-power L-band modulator, on loan from the
Spallation Neutron Source at Oak Ridge National
Laboratory, has been fully installed and tested in End
Station B. The klystron has been successfully operated
for hundreds of hours into an rf load at powers of up to
4.8 MW. Construction of rf waveguide distribution and
laboratory facilities for a dedicated coupler test stand
has begun. Preparations for installing a full-power
L-band positron capture cavity have also begun.
Commissioning of the facilities for E-163 continued,
with extensive studies to improve the quantum efficiency
of the cathode, and commissioning of the full injector
beamline and diagnostics up to the extraction point
completed. Installation of the experiment beamline and
its associated controls also progressed. Approval to
operate E-163 is expected in early FY2007, and final
commissioning will proceed thereafter.
NLCTA Schedule
The NLCTA accelerator ran routinely in support of the
E-163 and X-band programs. The L-band program, not yet
coupled to the NLCTA beamline, operated independently.
Budget cuts in midFY2006 necessitated halving the
operating hours for the remainder of year.
In FY2007, the NLCTA will operate approximately 1,000
hours in support of E-163, including commissioning of
the extraction beamline. The L-band positron cavity will
be installed and operated for approximately 1,000 hours.
A prototype Marx-bank modulator will be installed and
testing will commence.
NLCTA Safety
The NLCTA implementation of the DOE Integrated Safety
and Environmental Management System (ISEMS) continues to
be singled out by laboratory management as “exemplary,”
and demonstrating “best practice among DOE labs.” The
ISEMS practice at NLCTA includes weekly
7:30 AM “tailgate” meetings to review the scope,
hazard controls, and approval of work in End Station B,
and two weekly operations meetings at 9:30 AM to provide
longer-term planning and coordination of activities in
the End Station. The NLCTA SAD was revised to include
the expanded facilities for E-163 and L-band research
and approval of the new SAD is pending.
5.B.2 EXPERIMENT “E-167: PLASMA WAKEFIELD
ACCELERATION by Mark Hogan
The E-167 Plasma Wakefield Acceleration Experiment
was the continuation of an experimental program to study
all aspects of beam-driven plasma wakefield
acceleration. The experiments were performed by a UCLA,
USC, SLAC/AARD collaboration using the unique high
energy, high peak current, short pulse SLAC beams. There
have been eighteen experimental runs (as experiments
E157, E162, E164, E164X and E167) utilizing over sixteen
months of beam time from June 1999 through April 2006.
The E157, E162, E164(X) data have been analyzed, and the
results have been published in eighteen papers in
peer-reviewed journals.
Data from experiments E164 and E164X were analyzed in
FY05, and the results were published in an article
featured on the cover of Physical Review Letters.
M. J. Hogan, et al., “Multi-GeV Energy Gain in a
Plasma Wakefield Accelerator,” Physical Review Letters
95, 054802, 2005.
In this paper, which has been widely recognized as a
milestone in the development of plasma accelerators, it
was shown that accelerating gradient in excess 27 GeV/m
were sustained for 10 cm of plasma length resulting in
energy gains of 2.7 GeV. The energy aperture of the
beamline downstream of the plasma limited the energy
gain and plasma length in E164 and E164X. That aperture
restriction was identified and removed, and in the first
E167 run in August 2005 energy gains of more than 10 GeV
were observed using a 30-cm-long plasma. The experiments
demonstrating this new world-record energy gain were in
progress just when the previous results in Hogan et al.
were being published and widely cited.
One of the major goals of plasma accelerator research
for high energy physics applications is to demonstrate
the ability to sustain ultrahigh accelerating fields
associated with relativistic plasma wakes over a length
long enough to at least double the energy of a real
collider beam. Although a small fractional increase
(10%) in the energy of beam electrons had been shown to
occur over a10cm-long plasma, that this could be
extended to energy doubling over a meter scale was by no
means clear. This is because such an extension
transitions from a regime in which the beam has no time
to distort, deplete or go unstable to a regime in which
it is significantly depleted and deformed via the long
interaction. This depletion is important because without
it there can never be high-energy transfer efficiency
from the drive electron beam to the wake. Without such a
high efficiency the overall energy budget of a future
hybrid collider that utilizes a conventional accelerator
as a driver for a plasma accelerator would not make
sense.
The final E167 run, carried out with the highest
energy electron beam available in the world today,
showed that instability is not a limitation. In April
2006, the collaboration demonstrated that an 85-cm-long
plasma could double the energy of some of the incoming
electrons from 42 to 85 GeV. These results have been
submitted for publication and are out for review.
In addition to the acceleration, wsome of the
properties of a new phenomenon have been observed and
measured, accelerated electrons that originate from the
plasma at high gradients. Analysis of the data from the
April 2006 experiment and further plasma accelerator
developments will be major activities in FY07. |