Contractor |
DOE Office |
Contract No.: DE-AC03-76SF00515 |
IMD Name: Karen Payne-Jones |
Point of Contact:
William B. Johnson |
Telephone No.: (510) 637-1747 |
Telephone No.:
(650) 926-2660 |
CO Name: Tyndal
Lindler |
FAX No.: (650)
926-5360 |
Telephone No.: (650) 926-4963(SLAC) |
E-mail: wbj@slac.stanford.edu |
(510) 637-1885 (OAK) |
Date of last assessment: October 1999
Departmental Overview
Laboratory Mission
The Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) is dedicated
to experimental and theoretical research in elementary particle physics and in
those fields that make use of its synchrotron radiation facilities, including
biology, chemistry, geology, material science and electrical engineering. This
includes the development of new techniques in particle acceleration and
detection, and of synchrotron radiation sources and associated instrumentation.
The Center is operated as a national user facility for the Department of Energy
by Stanford University.
Organizational Mission
The Printing and Reproduction functional area
self-assessment is based on, and measured against, performance objectives and
standards as reflected in Performance Based Management measures that were
jointly defined by SLAC managers and their DOE/OAK counterparts in order to
address customer satisfaction, cost efficiency, and contract compliance.
Names, titles, affiliations of participants
Bill
Johnson, IRM Computing Manager, BSD
Larry
Fisher, Buyer, Purchasing Department, BSD
Dianne
Morris, Acting Manager of the Reproduction Facility, Mechanical Design
Status of Goals for FY00:
The Duplicating Facility is the only copying
activity at the Laboratory where records are kept of the number and nature of
copies produced; however the Facility handles less than 20% of the copies
generated at SLACthe other 80% are generated by convenience copiers. No
automated process exists for capturing information from the convenience copiers,
and manual methods are too labor intensive and intimidating to be practical.
It would appear there is a better measure available than the Duplicating
Facility measurement.
Performance Objective/Measure: The Laboratory
manages information as a corporate resource to improve the quality of its
products, to add value to scientific programs and customer services, and as a
tool to improve its work processes. Information will be made available rapidly
and cost effectively and will be distributed to the public, industrial partners
and stakeholders, as appropriate.
Assumptions: For purposes of this performance
objective, the "information management" elements include Printing and
Reproduction.
Process used to meet objective/measure: Three
representative measures have been chosen that reflect the performance of the
SLAC Reproduction facility, an area where measurements are readily available.
Details of these measures are summarized in Appendix A
Findings:
Discussion: As noted above, gradients for the percentage of double-sided
copying are based on Duplicating Facility records that comprise slightly less
than 20% of the copying done at SLAC. The
sample handled by the Duplicating Facility probably differs substantially from
the 80% generated by convenience copiers and probably is composed of large
volume jobs and may contain large numbers of single sided poster jobs.
Although modern convenience copiers produce double-sided copies more
reliably than in former times, it is unlikely that the 67% goal could have been
achieved with convenience copiers either. People
would probably prefer double sided copies in order to reduce paper volume but
have been conditioned by paper jams and other malfunctions of copying equipment
to accept single sided copies as a more efficient use of time.
The cost-per-copy figure for the Duplicating Facility has returned a value similar to those seen in previous years. Since the Duplicating Facility has essentially a fixed operating costs, cost-per-copy depends almost entirely on required volume. The Laboratory simply doesnt seem to need such high volume duplication. This is not necessarily a bad thing and perhaps indicates simply a cost threshold phenomenon that the Laboratory must maintain in order to provide volume duplication facilities.
Customer satisfaction is extremely high and we intend to continue
to maintain that high satisfaction.
Overall Performance
Customer Satisfaction:
Treating each of the divisional components of this functional area independently:
Cost/Efficiency
Again treating divisional components separately:
Contract compliance:
SLAC is in compliance with all DOE Orders dealing with Printing and Reproduction.
Survey
Question Results for FY00
Question in Survey |
Excellent |
Very Good |
Satisfactory |
Poor |
|
|
|
|
|
1. I received my
duplicating request in a timely manner. |
413 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
2. My duplicating
job was completed as requested. |
412 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
3. The duplicating
staff are courteous and helpful. |
411 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
4. I am informed as
soon as my request is ready for pick-up. |
406 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Excellent |
% Very Good |
% Satisfactory |
% Poor |
1. I received my
duplicating request in a timely manner. |
99.0 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
2. My duplicating
job was completed as requested. |
99.0 |
0.7 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
3. The duplicating
staff are courteous and helpful. |
99.0 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
4. I am informed as
soon as my request is ready for pick-up. |
98.5 |
1.2 |
0.2 |
0.8 |